Judging a book by its cover

Occasionally, I receive multiple review books together. They usually have different due dates, so I prioritize whichever one is due first. If they share a due date, I have to decide which one to read first, and I generally take a “save the best for last” approach. At that point, I only have the cover to go by, and since it’s an advanced copy, that’s usually the back cover, with the blurb, rather than a fully illustrated front cover.

This worked for me well last time, when I read a fantasy book before Side Life. This time, well, after the first chapter of the first (of two) book… I considered that I may have gotten them in the wrong order.  The first book had an illustrated front and plain back cover; the description alluded to an existing world that I had no concept of.  With no solid expectations going into it, I was rolling in laughter before I finished the first chapter.  There were so many quotable quotes, I chose not to flood my Facebook friends with more than a couple.  So I confess, I totally misjudged that book (and I’m not telling you which it was) based on the back cover.

And yet, as much as I liked it, I enjoyed the second book I had received that much more.  This was what I’ll call a true review copy – plain covers on the front and back – so I only had the blurb on the back to judge by before I started reading.  I may share that review at some point in the future; they publish elsewhere first.  Based on the blurb, I knew that the protagonist was a half-orc, defending a borderland between the humans and the orcs, and that he discovers during the story that there are things he doesn’t understand.  The character development is particularly well-written, you can understand both why the character is missing information and how he adapts as he learns.  If you get the chance, read The Grey Bastards by Jonathan French.  Then add the sequel to your want to read list; it doesn’t appear to have a publication date yet.